The story of terrorism in Germany is told again and again. Especially films can impact our conception of this period, while viewers cannot be certain whether the film corresponds to the “truth”. History is always a certain perspective on the past. That’s why it’s important to know how directors are influencing the audience with their films.
Which conception of the history of the German Autumn does director Heinrich Breloer want to convey by means of his film “Todesspiel” (Death Game)?
Let’s say a new film about the German Autumn 1977 is being produced. A sequence in prison right after the kidnapping is supposed to be filmed. The terrorists are in their cells and hear about the attack on television. Simultaneously, the prison officers receive the order to implement the contact ban.
Watch the film clip. It likewise shows the situation in Stammheim directly after the kidnapping.
The selection of elements that a director makes for a film sequence is already an interpretation of history. That means that there is no neutral perspective. Which intention a director is pursuing becomes more clear when you compare two sequences. In the left-hand column, you can see a series of still images that might reflect the scene of searching Baader’s cell.
Which cinematic techniques are used to depict the relationship of the terrorist Baader and the state?
How does the director try to substantiate the authenticity of his story? “Todesspiel” (Engl. Death Game) is not a historical feature film, but a docudrama. That means that acted scenes are blended with reports from the past. In doing so, they try to convey an impression of authenticity.